W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > October 2007

Re: [becss] "Behavioral Extensions to CSS" computed value question

From: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 22:22:24 +0100
Message-ID: <4723AC10.7070701@david-woolley.me.uk>
To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>

Anne van Kesteren wrote:

>> It is not a good idea to invalidate the presumption that CSS is 
>> relatively benign.
> That is already an unsafe assumption given the vendor extensions in 
> existance.

Doesn't surprise me.  Executable content is just too appealing to people 
who don't understand the risks.  I'm glad I'm not an IT manager, 
particular one somewhere with high security requirements.

David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
Received on Saturday, 27 October 2007 21:22:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:55 GMT