W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > October 2007

Re: [becss] "Behavioral Extensions to CSS" computed value question

From: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 22:22:24 +0100
Message-ID: <4723AC10.7070701@david-woolley.me.uk>
To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>

Anne van Kesteren wrote:

>> It is not a good idea to invalidate the presumption that CSS is 
>> relatively benign.
> 
> That is already an unsafe assumption given the vendor extensions in 
> existance.

Doesn't surprise me.  Executable content is just too appealing to people 
who don't understand the risks.  I'm glad I'm not an IT manager, 
particular one somewhere with high security requirements.


-- 
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
Received on Saturday, 27 October 2007 21:22:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:55 GMT