W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > October 2007

Re: [becss] "Behavioral Extensions to CSS" computed value question

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 22:32:17 +0200
To: "David Woolley" <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.t0vhz3zc64w2qv@annevk-t60.oslo.opera.com>

On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 22:03:23 +0200, David Woolley  
<forums@david-woolley.me.uk> wrote:
> Could I suggest that bind be explicitly forbidden in style attributes,  
> and user agents required to ignore it there.  Otherwise you are changing  
> the rules under which content management/BBS systems make third party  
> content safe and you will increase the pressure for methods of marking  
> sections of web pages as unsafe, as recently proposed on www-html.
>
> It is not a good idea to invalidate the presumption that CSS is  
> relatively benign.

That is already an unsafe assumption given the vendor extensions in  
existance.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Saturday, 27 October 2007 20:32:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:55 GMT