Re: [becss] "Behavioral Extensions to CSS" computed value question

David Woolley wrote:
> 
> I very much hope not, as one of the advantages of CSS is that it does 
> not have the power of a general programming language and is therefore 
> much less likely to provide access to security holes, and, at least in 
> principle, easier to analyze mechanically.

The BECSS draft already crosses this line by importing scripts through
the 'binding' property. I haven't seen any serious discussion in the WG
about the security implications of this.

~fantasai