- From: Kornel Lesinski <kornel@osiolki.net>
- Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 00:34:39 +0100
- To: freyjkell@gmail.com
- Cc: www-style <www-style@w3.org>
On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 15:45:10 +0100, Nikodem <freyjkell@gmail.com> wrote: > I wonder mostly about IE (other UAs are generally good), because I don't > wanna see anymore such shit like: > > <!--[if IE]><link rel="stylesheet" href="ie-sux.css"/><![endif]--> > <![if !IE><link rel="stylesheet" href="non-ie-rox.css"/><![endif]> > <!-- non-commented <![if ...]> is also incorrect HTML code --> > <!--[if IE]><script src="re-styler.js"></script><![endif]--> > * html div#123 > d\iv#abc > > My proposal, even if will be issued in IE 99, can clear CSS code. Conditional comments in HTML encourage using completely separate stylesheet for IE, so all ugly code is kept in one place and can be easily revised when Microsoft changes IE. Your proposal makes it easier to pollute CSS code with UA-specific hacks, so I don't think that's improvement over conditional HTML comments in terms of CSS tidyness. I'm still longing for @required though... -- regards, Kornel Lesiński
Received on Saturday, 20 October 2007 23:35:24 UTC