W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > October 2007

RE: [CSS21] CR-CSS21-20070719, 8.3.1 Collapsing in presence of min/max-height, small correction suggested

From: Bruno Fassino <fassino@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 08:15:18 +0200
To: "'L. David Baron'" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <000e01c80ef2$cfd3fc30$6905a8c0@bruno>

Bruno Fassino wrote:

> L. David Baron wrote:
>
> > The intent was that the conditions exclude cases where min-height or
> > max-height affects the used height.
>
>
> Yes, I agree on this. And I believe that cases when the
> min-height is "equal" to the used height are cases when
> min-height is not affecting the used height. So I believe
> that this case ("equal") should be added to the mentioned
> case, which means:
>  "min-height less than the element's used height"
> becomes:
>  "min-height less than or equal the element's used height"


I see now that the issue is caused by my incorrect reading of "used height",
since this is the height "after" min-height is applied, and so my suggested
change is indeed wrong.

But the current phrasing of the condition doesn't allow to distinguish the
case when the height "before" min-height is applied (the computed height?)
is equal to min-height. Is this the case that I wanted to add, since in this
case the min-height is not in effect, and it is currently excluded.


Best regards,
Bruno

--
Bruno Fassino http://www.brunildo.org/test
Received on Monday, 15 October 2007 06:15:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:55 GMT