- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 12:17:16 -0400
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- CC: www-style@w3.org
Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>
> The CSS 2.1 specification has detailed rules for replaced elements
> dealing with images that lack one or more of the following: intrinsic
> height, intrinsic width and intrinsic aspect ratio.
>
> The definition for 'background-image' doesn't seem to deal in with the
> case where you have an intrinsic height and aspect ratio but do not have
> an intrinsic width.
>
> The definitions for 'content', 'list-style-image' and 'cursor' don't
> deal with such images at all. (Although maybe for 'content' you'd use
> the rules for replaced elements and if ::marker is ever implemented
> 'list-style-image:foo' would be some type of short hand for ::marker {
> content:foo }.)
>
> I think it would be nice if these cases were clarified so some proper
> testcases on "SVG as image" support can be made hopefully ensuring that
> new implementations will be reasonably correct from the start and
> content won't start relying on suboptimal behavior.
Recorded as issue 10:
http://csswg.inkedblade.net/spec/css2.1#issue-10
~fantasai
Received on Thursday, 11 October 2007 16:17:35 UTC