Re: Proposal of @ua

Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis wrote:

> Indeed, but note that's true for JS too. For example, you can detect 
> getElementById but you can't be sure it won't get elements by NAME too 
> (as the JScript implementation does). But JS feature detection is still 
> generally preferable to browser detection. But perhaps one would need 
> both to work around known broken implementations.

Perhaps one could add engine detection to the @feature syntax to 
encourage authors to feature detect before they engine-detect, rather 
than having a separate @ua statement, like so:

@feature (display: inline-block;) with engine(Gecko, <= 1.9) {
/* Gecko's known broken implementation of inline block. */
}

--
Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis