- From: Bert Bos <bert@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 17:31:16 +0100
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Saturday 17 November 2007 00:24, fantasai wrote: > Anne van Kesteren wrote: > > background-position should be defined in such a way that it takes > > the resulting size of the image into account and not be based on > > the original size of the image. A line saying that references to > > the dimensions of the image refer to the size after background-size > > has been applied would suffice I think. For -o-background-size we > > currently implement the non-intuitive version and are planning to > > change this. > > > > http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-css3-background-20050216 > > I'll make this change unless Bert objects. Bert, do you object? :) No need. I made that "change" (I actually thought it was no more than a clarification) in the draft more than a year ago :-) Bert -- Bert Bos ( W 3 C ) http://www.w3.org/ http://www.w3.org/people/bos W3C/ERCIM bert@w3.org 2004 Rt des Lucioles / BP 93 +33 (0)4 92 38 76 92 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
Received on Wednesday, 21 November 2007 16:31:38 UTC