Re: W3C CSS Home Redesign RFC

Jason CranfordTeague wrote:

> As for making it "pretty" a low priority over making it "usable", in my 
> a opinion usable has to be "pretty". 

Can you explain that ?  I would have thought that in order
to be usable, a site has to be accessible; if it's pretty
as well, that's a bonus (for sighted users) but in the
greater scheme of things, I'd look for "accessible",
"navigable", "consistent", "coherent", "intuitive" and any
one of a half-dozen or so similar concepts before "pretty".

Philip TAYLOR