Re: [CSS3 Background] Background shorthand

• From: David Hyatt <hyatt@apple.com>
• Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2007 10:48:50 -0600
• To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
• Cc: www-style@w3.org
• Message-id: <0CC9744D-17AC-483D-9703-E76A96E29FD9@apple.com>

On Nov 4, 2007, at 7:42 AM, fantasai wrote:

>
> In the current definition of the 'background' shorthand, the  
> 'background-image'
> value is required (but it can be 'none') for all but the final  
> layouer. I think
> this unnecessarily complicates the syntax, and therefore I suggest  
> we make it
> optional. That way the only difference between the final layer and  
> all other
> layers will be the possible presence of a background color.


I agree.  It is optional in the WebKit implementation of multiple  
backgrounds.

dave

Received on Sunday, 4 November 2007 16:49:07 UTC