Re: [CSS3 Background] Background shorthand

On Nov 4, 2007, at 7:42 AM, fantasai wrote:

>
> In the current definition of the 'background' shorthand, the  
> 'background-image'
> value is required (but it can be 'none') for all but the final  
> layouer. I think
> this unnecessarily complicates the syntax, and therefore I suggest  
> we make it
> optional. That way the only difference between the final layer and  
> all other
> layers will be the possible presence of a background color.


I agree.  It is optional in the WebKit implementation of multiple  
backgrounds.

dave