W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > November 2007

Re: [CSS3-content] [css3-lists] [css3-page] Implied counter-increment

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2007 21:19:21 -0400
Message-ID: <472BCC99.1090404@inkedblade.net>
To: www-style@w3.org

L. David Baron wrote:
> On Wednesday 2007-10-17 14:18 -0400, fantasai wrote:
>> I think at this point I'm leaning towards changing the 'page' counter to 
>> behave like
>> the 'list-item' counter, and introducing an 'inhibit' value for 
>> counter-increment that
>> will cause any implied counters to not be incremented.
> 
> What's the use case for this?  Why not just say that the implied
> counters always increment, and if authors want something else they
> should define their own counter that does what they want (or
> introduce -1 increments to undo the implied ones at the same
> points)?

Actually, they'd want 0 increments, not -1 increments.

~fantasai
Received on Saturday, 3 November 2007 01:19:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:56 GMT