W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > March 2007

RE: Expected overflow behavior for element with clip set?

From: Eli Friedman <sharparrow1@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 14:14:57 -0800 (PST)
To: rahlfors@wildcatsoftware.net
Cc: www-style@w3.org
Message-ID: <576367.34314.qm@web52108.mail.yahoo.com>

That's about right; the specification isn't really
clear about what to do, which is why I'm bringing it
up here instead of just changing the bahavior.  If the
correct behavior was clear, there would be no need to
discuss it.

-Eli

--- Rainer ┼hlfors <rahlfors@wildcatsoftware.net>
wrote:

> 
> I just want to make sure we are clear with regards
> to any future discussion,
> and differentiating between browser bugs (as in,
> incorrect implementation of
> spec in browser) and undesired browser behavior (as
> in, spec is vague or
> unclear, causing expected user behavior not to align
> with spec, as is the
> case with this scenario).
> 
>  
> Rainer
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Boris Zbarsky [mailto:bzbarsky@MIT.EDU] 
> Sent: Friday, March 02, 2007 12:19 PM
> To: rahlfors@wildcatsoftware.net
> Cc: www-style@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Expected overflow behavior for element
> with clip set?
> 
> Rainer ┼hlfors wrote:
> > the spec as written today supports the behavior of
> the browsers. Hence, it
> is
> > not a browser bug.
> 
> No one ever claimed it's a browser bug.  The mail
> you were responding to 
> was a comment on the spec, not on implementations.
> 
> -Boris
> 
> 
> 



 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Cheap talk?
Check out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates.
http://voice.yahoo.com
Received on Friday, 2 March 2007 22:15:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:49 GMT