On Jun 26, 2007, at 13:04, Jens Meiert wrote: >> I've realized now that the current spec drops the style attribute for >> all elements except for the <font>, but I can't understand the >> reasoning behind those decisions. > > And neither do I, As can be discovered by following the URLs in my previous message to this thread, it was a failed attempt to attach the stigma of the <font> element to the style='' attribute. http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/whatwg/20070503#l-494 > The usual way to address that is by setting "width" and "height" > attributes which should be replaced by the "style" attribute (that > is presentational by design). In my opinion, it is extremely silly to think that height='' and width='' are bad but style='width: ...; height: ...;' is good. I'd rather have height='' and width='' on all elements that are replaced elements in the normal case. > 2. Delivering the ad with 'border="0"' (or worse). (Presentational.) > 3. Delivering the ad with 'style="border: 0;"'. (More kids in town.) Those are both presentational. (I'm not implying that presentational was bad.) > Consequently, I consider it not necessarily wise to drop the > "style" attribute. I agree, FWIW. (Perhaps for different reasons, though.) -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen@iki.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/Received on Tuesday, 26 June 2007 11:53:34 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 11 September 2008 23:28:56 GMT