On Tue, 2007-05-06 at 14:33 +0200, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > Testing shows that Internet Explorer 7 does not support it and Opera 9 and > Firefox 2 do... Given that .width is basically a shorthand for > setProperty("width", setted value, null) I suppose what Internet Explorer > 7 does is more logical. Except that it throws an exception. It seems more > natural to simply ignore the setting to maintain the forward compatible > parsing rules of CSS. > > Also, "setted value" above has to be parsed per the "S* expr" grammar from > CSS 2.1 (or some superset of that if the browser supports more). > > Would specifying something to that effect make sense? Probably indicating > that including !important would lead to the method call being ignored? Either ignored or treated as without !important. I can't think of a reason why specificity would matter in this case. -- Thank you for your time. Regards, Zoffix Znet ( http://zoffix.com , http://haslayout.net )Received on Tuesday, 5 June 2007 12:56:59 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:51 GMT