W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > June 2007

Re: [OT] Re: font size in tables

From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2007 01:50:06 +0100
Message-ID: <465F6D3E.30609@splintered.co.uk>
To: W3C CSS <www-style@w3.org>

James Craig wrote:
> If you want to discuss CSS 
> specifications, this is the place.

I was under the impression that, at its core, the question was one of "I 
don't understand why this is happening based on what the spec says" (was 
going to point out that what actually gets inherited is the computed 
value of 75%, and not the actual "calculate 75% of your parent element" 
rule, but was waiting to see if that's what Tim actually meant).

Fair enough, though...

P
-- 
Patrick H. Lauke
______________________________________________________________
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
http://redux.deviantart.com
______________________________________________________________
Co-lead, Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force
http://webstandards.org/
______________________________________________________________
Take it to the streets ... join the WaSP Street Team
http://streetteam.webstandards.org/
______________________________________________________________
Received on Friday, 1 June 2007 00:50:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:51 GMT