- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 08:10:01 +0000 (UTC)
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Tue, 23 Jan 2007, L. David Baron wrote: > > So I propose to replace the sentence quoted above with the > following: > > The root's background-color may not be completely opaque, for > example, because it was specified using the 'transparent' keyword, > the rgba() function, or the hsla() function. This specification > does not define what the canvas's background is drawn on top of. I have no objection to this concept, but please avoid the term "may not", as it is confusing from an RFC2119 point of view. Cheers, -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Wednesday, 24 January 2007 08:10:16 UTC