- From: Bert Bos <bert@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 18:58:57 +0200
- To: www-style@w3.org
- Cc: spartanicus.3@ntlworld.ie
The CSS WG agreed with my reply[2] to Spartanicus's comment[1] about ignoring vs flagging an image that fails to download. Thus, the CSS level 2 spec is unchanged and still allows the UA to decide whether to ignore or flag the missing image (but we expect an enhancement to the 'content' property in CSS3 that lets the author decide). [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Dec/0086.html [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2007Feb/0105.html Spartanicus, should we note in the forthcoming "Disposition of comments" that you disagree with this resolution, based on [3]? Or can you in fact accept it? [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2007Feb/0108.html (For reference, this is issue 12 in the forthcoming "Disposition of Comments.") For the CSS WG, Bert -- Bert Bos ( W 3 C ) http://www.w3.org/ http://www.w3.org/people/bos W3C/ERCIM bert@w3.org 2004 Rt des Lucioles / BP 93 +33 (0)4 92 38 76 92 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
Received on Monday, 16 April 2007 16:59:01 UTC