W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > September 2006

Re: [XHTML 2] renaming :link to :unvisited

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 15:17:06 +0200
To: "David Latapie" <david@empyree.org>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Cc: www-style@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.tgla6swu64w2qv@id-c0020>

On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 15:07:01 +0200, David Latapie <david@empyree.org>  
wrote:
> Why people keep talking about backward compatibility since XHTML 2.0 is  
> *not* supposed to backward-compatible?

CSS is. And your issue is regarding CSS.


And if XHTML 2.0 really wants to use the same namespace as XHTML 1.0 they  
have to backwards compatible as well... (And solve all the issues XHTML  
1.0 has first.)


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Thursday, 28 September 2006 13:17:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:47 GMT