Re: [css3-namespace] XML Core WG's review

On Wednesday, September 6, 2006, 10:25:38 PM, Anne wrote:

AvK> On Wed, 06 Sep 2006 22:17:12 +0200, Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com> wrote:
>> 2) Since this module is about namespaces, we believe it should make
>> a normative, rather than an informative, reference to Namespaces 1.0
>> and Namespaces 1.1.  Both are needed to handle both XML 1.0 and XML 1.1
>> documents.  In addition, the references should be to the undated
>> (latest)
>> versions of these documents rather than to specific dated editions.

AvK> How does that cover the theoretical Namespaces 2.0, Namespaces for HTML
AvK> and Namespaces for Tree-based-language Triple-X?

Which is why the specification should clearly state that it is about CSS and XML namespaces (1.0 and 1.1), not about, say, Perl namespaces or flying ducks or whatever


-- 
 Chris Lilley                    mailto:chris@w3.org
 Interaction Domain Leader
 Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group
 W3C Graphics Activity Lead
 Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG