- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2006 09:51:59 +0200
- To: "Boris Zbarsky" <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Thu, 07 Sep 2006 09:26:38 +0200, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote:
> Yes, but because it's overconstrained, so the value for "right" is
> ignored (if direction is "ltr"). That is, in this case you have
> specified all three of width, left, and right....
Fair point. I prolly shouldn't have included the height="" and width=""
attributes. New example:
<div><img src="image" alt=""></div>
div { position:relative; width:1000px }
img { position:absolute; left:0; right:0 }
The image has an intrinsic width of 200px by 200px. The current
specification says you have to ignore right again which might not make
sense to anyone...
--
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Thursday, 7 September 2006 07:52:21 UTC