- From: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
- Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2006 12:35:54 +1000
- To: Andrew Fedoniouk <news@terrainformatica.com>
- CC: W3C CSS List <www-style@w3.org>
Andrew Fedoniouk wrote: > If :not will be relaxed to contain not only simple selectors > then selector > [...] > Say selector like > X Y:not(X > Y) > naturally complements "X Y" and "X>Y" selectors. I think that would be equivalent to this: X :not(X)>Y Both would select a Y that is a descendant (but not a child) of an X. -- Lachlan Hunt http://lachy.id.au/
Received on Friday, 1 September 2006 02:36:10 UTC