- From: Mats Palmgren <mats.palmgren@bredband.net>
- Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 16:23:30 +0200
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- CC: www-style@w3.org
Ian Hickson wrote: > The working group considered that (some time ago) but decided that > interoperability was more important on layout issues like this (since lack > of interoperability could break pages in this case). FYI, the three most widely used UAs (IE, Gecko, Opera) have different layout for even the simplest of border-collapse tables and *none* of them complies with CSS 2.1 in this respect. I think the current text is a mistake and since UAs currently isn't interoperable it's not to late to correct. It's fine for fixed table layout where it makes sense to just look at the first row, but for automatic table layout I think we should require UAs to consider all borders and grow the margins as needed, as fantasai once suggested: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2003Mar/0003 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155955 Regards, Mats Palmgren
Received on Tuesday, 10 October 2006 14:24:05 UTC