On Sun, 28 May 2006, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > > http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/syndata.html#value-def-uri doesn't seem to > handle what should happen with various status codes. It seems logically > that browsers should transparently follow redirects (though not all > do[1]), but it's a bit unclear what should happen when the server gives > you a 410 response back, a 404 or similar status code. Would you still > use it for background:url() if the response contains an image? Would you > not show "the image," but still apply color et cetera? > > And if CSS 2.1 is not going to define his in detail, as the last > paragraph seems to hint, can > http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-css3-values-20050726/#uris do it? This seems to be an issue with HTTP, not CSS. What would you want CSS to say, exactly? We can't require a particular UI or anything... -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'Received on Monday, 9 October 2006 22:24:15 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 11 September 2008 23:28:53 GMT