Boris Zbarsky wrote: > Or we could allow things other than simple selectors as arguments to > :not... The biggest problems here are (a) the computation of the specificity of such a selector (b) of course the fact that not(a and b) is not(a) or not(b). </Daniel>Received on Saturday, 18 November 2006 05:13:36 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:47 GMT