W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > May 2006

Re: proposal: @supports and :supports

From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 21:27:36 +0200
To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
Cc: www-style@w3.org
Message-ID: <fq8h72hdrlfg8nqandu29bsvipkd78fe8g@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>

* Boris Zbarsky wrote:
>Testing for "is the feature there?" works.  Testing for
>"does the UA say the feature is there?" does not work.

That doesn't sound very meaningful without some definition of these
concepts. It seems a "test" like

  if (obj.method_name) ...

is "testing" for "does the UA say the feature is there?" How would
a client side "test" for "is the feature there?" look like? I can't 
think of one that would be meaningful in practise.
-- 
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ 
Received on Saturday, 27 May 2006 19:27:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:45 GMT