On Friday 21 July 2006 07:05, karl@w3.org wrote: > Hi, > This is a QA Review comment for "CSS3 Advanced Layout Module" > http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-css3-layout-20051215/ > 2005-12-15 > 1st WD > > About > http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-css3-layout-20051215/#template-based > > We can see all examples labeled with "Example I". A mistake? There was an ambiguity in the definition of 'counter-increment' in CSS2. It has been fixed in CSS 2.1, but the style sheet of this module still uses the interpretation that we rejected. I'll fix the style sheet. Bert -- Bert Bos ( W 3 C ) http://www.w3.org/ http://www.w3.org/people/bos W3C/ERCIM bert@w3.org 2004 Rt des Lucioles / BP 93 +33 (0)4 92 38 76 92 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, FranceReceived on Monday, 24 July 2006 14:31:30 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:46 GMT