David Woolley wrote: > Generally search engine operators strongly discourage the serving > of special versions of pages to search engines. They want to index > the same material as the searcher will see, not some search engine > attractive alternative. Agreed. But with which CSS medi{a|um} will the search engine identify itself (if "all" is not used) : "screen", "print", "aural" ? As the engine has no knowledge of the preferred medium, it would have to accept all of these (and more, if they exist : "paged-media" ?). I do take your point, but am not convinced things are as clear-cut as they might be. > The current search engine hinting generally has the effect of making > the page less attractive to the search engine, or, if misused, less > useful, whereas a search engine style sheet could result in an almost > completely different visible content which adds in keyword stuffing > in the search engine variant. Yes, that is indeed a problem : visibility could be toggled on the basis of the CSS medium identifier, which would be a Bad Thing ... Philip TaylorReceived on Saturday, 8 July 2006 08:52:13 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 11 September 2008 23:28:51 GMT