Re: I18n comment: en-cockney

It was clearly felt to be acceptable as an example when

	http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-html40-970917/struct/dirlang.html

was written.
--------
Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, Philip TAYLOR wrote:
> 
>>I cannot see that this change accomplishes anything. RFC 3066 says "- 
>>Dialect or variant information, such as en-scouse" where the phrase 
>>"such as" is clearly essential. The use of "en-scouse" as an example in 
>>no way precludes the possibility of "en-cockney" being an equally valid 
>>production.
> 
> 
> Except that en-scouse is registered and valid, and en-cockney is not.
>