W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > January 2006

Re: I18n comment: syntax document

From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 23:39:02 +0900
To: www-style@w3.org, public-i18n-core@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.s3t5ncp3x1753t@ibm-60d333fc0ec>

On Sat, 21 Jan 2006 19:54:07 +0900, <ishida@w3.org> wrote:

>
> Comment from the i18n review of:
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-css3-selectors-20051215/
>
> Comment 23
> At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0601-css3-selectors/
> Editorial/substantive: E
> Location in reviewed document:
> Sec. 6.1.1  
> [http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-css3-selectors-20051215/#typenmsp]
>
> Comment:
> Please add a link to the Syntax document, and make it a dependency.
>
>
>
>> From: Bjoern Hoehrmann [mailto:derhoermi@gmx.net]
>> Sent: 20 January 2006 15:22
>
>> In #23, what do you mean by making the syntax module a
>> dependency? It is perfectly reasonable to use CSS Selectors
>> without other parts of the CSS syntax, e.g. as selection
>> mechanism in an API, and the draft refers to the module only
>> to point out that that module defines a namespace prefix
>> binding mechanism.
>

see my reply to a mail from Daniel about the unclearness of dependency of
this draft on CSS.
Received on Monday, 23 January 2006 14:39:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:42 GMT