W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > January 2006

I18n comment: Notion of type

From: <ishida@w3.org>
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 10:32:08 +0000
To: www-style@w3.org, public-i18n-core@w3.org
Message-Id: <20060121103205.36D3B4F1FD@homer.w3.org>

Comment from the i18n review of:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-css3-selectors-20051215/

Comment 2
At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0601-css3-selectors/
Editorial/substantive: E
Location in reviewed document:
General

Comment:
Your notion of "type": It would be good if you note that there are different notions of types, e.g. the element name as a type (as in the case of CSS) as the XML Schema notion of types.



> From: Bjoern Hoehrmann [mailto:derhoermi@gmx.net] 
> Sent: 20 January 2006 15:22

> I disagree with #2, the term element type has 
> well-established semantics in XML and SGML, I don't see how 
> explaining that element types are not data types, or 
> personality types, or whatever. We should change s/type 
> element selectors/element type selectors/ in 1.3 though.
Received on Saturday, 21 January 2006 10:32:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:42 GMT