- From: Kelly Miller <lightsolphoenix@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 21:45:04 -0500
- To: HeroreV <herorev@yahoo.com>
- CC: W3C Style List <www-style@w3.org>
Yeah, even that is better than using a comma-separated list of values. The syntax for background: is already really ugly, and it's only going to get more ugly as properties are added. Making it a comma list will multiply that by a huge factor. HeroreV wrote: > The new arrays in the CSS-OM could have plural names. > Setting a value for backgroundImages[0] would also set > a value for backgroundImage. > > This is similar to how setting a value for > element.style.background can also set values for > element.style.backgroundImage, > element.style.backgroundColor, etc. > -- http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/ - Get Firefox! http://www.mozilla.org/products/thunderbird/ - Reclaim Your Inbox! Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
Received on Tuesday, 17 January 2006 02:45:51 UTC