- From: Daniel Schierbeck <daniel.schierbeck@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 16:50:39 +0100
- To: Paul Mitchell <paul@paul-mitchell.me.uk>
- CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Paul Mitchell wrote: > > Daniel Schierbeck wrote: > >> Chris Sullins wrote: >> >>> In my opinion, "style" makes perfect sense. >> >> I'm not sure I agree. I do not speak English natively, so I may be >> wrong about this. I see "style" simply as colors and fonts etc. - >> what about animations? I'd much prefer "presentation", which in my >> mind covers more ground. > > Indeed, "presentation" is the word I use in my software. Were we > starting afresh, that is a word I would prefer over "style". I think we are in some sense starting afresh - aren't we talking about having this element in the XML namespace? That's a major break from the XHTML <style/> element. I think we might as well use an appropriate element type name, since we break backwards compatability anyway. Cheers, Daniel Schierbeck
Received on Thursday, 23 February 2006 15:50:32 UTC