W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2006

Re: [BULK] - Re: [XHTML2] Spirit of "1.1.3. XHTML 2 and Presentation" (PR#7759)

From: Laurens Holst <lholst@students.cs.uu.nl>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 20:04:53 +0100
Message-ID: <43FA12D5.2060806@students.cs.uu.nl>
To: Richard Mitchell <richard.j.mitchell@gmail.com>
Cc: www-style@w3.org

Richard Mitchell schreef:
> David Dorward wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 04:04:46PM +0000, Paul Mitchell wrote:
>>>> That's actually what I meant.  Though I know CSS isn't in XML syntax,
>>>> IMO there should be a one-element XML definiton for an equivalent 
>>>> to the
>>>> HTML <style> element that can be used to embed CSS in any XML 
>>>> language.
>>> I agree. I vote we settle on <style> and <script>. Are they likely 
>>> to mean anything else, ever?
>> <style> could indicate something in an XML format designed to describe
>> a fashion catalogue.
>> <script> could be the root element of an XML format for movie scripts.
> Would something like <!style> be allowed under XML?

Why would you want that?


XML is a reserved namespace prefix. You don’t even have to declare it.


Ushiko-san! Kimi wa doushite, Ushiko-san!!
Laurens Holst, student, university of Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Website: www.grauw.nl. Backbase employee; www.backbase.com.
Received on Monday, 20 February 2006 19:05:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:43 GMT