Richard Mitchell schreef: > > David Dorward wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 04:04:46PM +0000, Paul Mitchell wrote: >> >>>> That's actually what I meant. Though I know CSS isn't in XML syntax, >>>> IMO there should be a one-element XML definiton for an equivalent >>>> to the >>>> HTML <style> element that can be used to embed CSS in any XML >>>> language. >>>> >> >> >>> I agree. I vote we settle on <style> and <script>. Are they likely >>> to mean anything else, ever? >>> >> >> <style> could indicate something in an XML format designed to describe >> a fashion catalogue. >> >> <script> could be the root element of an XML format for movie scripts. >> >> > Would something like <!style> be allowed under XML? Why would you want that? xml:style XML is a reserved namespace prefix. You don’t even have to declare it. ~Grauw -- Ushiko-san! Kimi wa doushite, Ushiko-san!! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Laurens Holst, student, university of Utrecht, the Netherlands. Website: www.grauw.nl. Backbase employee; www.backbase.com.Received on Monday, 20 February 2006 19:05:02 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:43 GMT