Re: [BULK] - Re: [XHTML2] Spirit of "1.1.3. XHTML 2 and Presentation" (PR#7759)

On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 04:04:46PM +0000, Paul Mitchell wrote:
> >That's actually what I meant.  Though I know CSS isn't in XML syntax,
> >IMO there should be a one-element XML definiton for an equivalent to the
> >HTML <style> element that can be used to embed CSS in any XML language.

> I agree. I vote we settle on <style> and <script>. Are they likely to 
> mean anything else, ever?

<style> could indicate something in an XML format designed to describe
a fashion catalogue.

<script> could be the root element of an XML format for movie scripts.


-- 
David Dorward                                      http://dorward.me.uk