W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2006

Re: I18n comment: syntax document

From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2006 10:47:01 +0900
To: "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>
Cc: www-style@w3.org, public-i18n-core@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.s4msknyyx1753t@ibm-60d333fc0ec.mag.keio.ac.jp>

Hi Iah, all,

On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 05:02:30 +0900, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote:

>
> On Sat, 21 Jan 2006 ishida@w3.org wrote:
>>
>> Comment: Please add a link to the Syntax document, and make it a
>> dependency.
>
> This is an official comment on behalf of the CSS working group.
>
> I do not understand your request. As Bjoern wrote:
>
>> > In #23, what do you mean by making the syntax module a
>> > dependency? It is perfectly reasonable to use CSS Selectors
>> > without other parts of the CSS syntax, e.g. as selection
>> > mechanism in an API, and the draft refers to the module only
>> > to point out that that module defines a namespace prefix
>> > binding mechanism.
>
>
> On Mon, 23 Jan 2006, Felix Sasaki wrote:
>>
>> see my reply to a mail from Daniel about the unclearness of dependency
>> of this draft on CSS.
>
> We do not understand why it seems unclear.
>
>
> I have made no change to the spec in response to this comment. In the
> likely event that this does not satisfy your request, please explain
> exactly what it is you would like to see, with your reasoning.
>
> Cheers,


We discussed your reply and decided to accept your resolution.
Thank you. Regards, Felix.
Received on Wednesday, 8 February 2006 01:47:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:43 GMT