W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2006

Re: I18n comment: period or full stop

From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 13:20:42 +0900
To: "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>, ishida@w3.org
Cc: www-style@w3.org, public-i18n-core@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.s3900so7x1753t@ibm-60d333fc0ec.mag.keio.ac.jp>

On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 04:34:26 +0900, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote:

> On Sat, 21 Jan 2006 ishida@w3.org wrote:
>> Comment: You use the name "period" for the character U+002E, which is
>> the Unicode 1.0 name for "full stop". You might change the naming or
>> make the reference to the Unicode version for this naming explicit.
> This is an official comment on behalf of the CSS working group.
> I've made this change:
> -<p>Working with HTML, authors may use the period (U+002E,
> -<code>.</code>) notation as an alternative to the <code>~=</code>
> +<p>Working with HTML, authors may use the "full stop" notation
> +(U+002E, <code>.</code>) as an alternative to the <code>~=</code>
>  notation when representing the <code>class</code> attribute. Thus, for
>  HTML, <code>div.value</code> and <code>div[class~=value]</code> have
>  the same meaning. The attribute value must immediately follow the
> -&quot;period&quot; (<code>.</code>).</p>
> +&quot;full stop&quot; (<code>.</code>).</p>
> Please let us know if this does not satisfy your request.

The i18n core working group is satisfied with your resolution. Thank you.
Regards, Felix.
Received on Wednesday, 1 February 2006 04:20:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:27:22 UTC