Le 12 déc. 06 à 08:15, Daniel Glazman a écrit : > > Kelly wrote: > >> I can't tell you why it's not stated, but the reason for >> extinction is that XBL2 can do everything BECSS can do, and then >> some. So really, BECSS is no longer necessary. > > Exactly. And it's not stated yet only because it was recently on WG's > agenda, we'll publish something about it as soon as we can. > > </Daniel> Thank you Kelly and Daniel for these prompt replies. -- </david_latapie> http://blog.empyree.org/ U+0F00Received on Tuesday, 12 December 2006 11:52:00 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 23 April 2007 18:22:34 GMT