- From: David Latapie <david@empyree.org>
- Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 12:51:35 +0100
- To: www-style@w3.org
Le 12 déc. 06 à 08:15, Daniel Glazman a écrit : > > Kelly wrote: > >> I can't tell you why it's not stated, but the reason for >> extinction is that XBL2 can do everything BECSS can do, and then >> some. So really, BECSS is no longer necessary. > > Exactly. And it's not stated yet only because it was recently on WG's > agenda, we'll publish something about it as soon as we can. > > </Daniel> Thank you Kelly and Daniel for these prompt replies. -- </david_latapie> http://blog.empyree.org/ U+0F00
Received on Tuesday, 12 December 2006 11:52:00 UTC