W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > December 2006

Re: arguments and embedding

From: David Latapie <david@empyree.org>
Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 10:31:08 +0100
Message-Id: <631ADD32-13C2-487E-B543-203A672EF341@empyree.org>
Cc: www-style@w3.org
To: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>


Le 2 déc. 06 à 13:34, David Woolley a écrit :

>
>> Does this never lead the rejectors to ask themselves /why/
>> these "variations" are so frequently proposed ?  Could it
>
> I think the main reason is that people don't look at the big
> picture when proposing them.

Is there somewhere on the W3C some kind of paper about this? If such  
a "big-picture" document exists, along with a compundium of most  
frequent mistakes, I dare to think it would help.


-- 
</david_latapie>
http://blog.empyree.org/   U+0F00
Received on Sunday, 3 December 2006 09:31:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:47 GMT