On Tuesday, August 15, 2006, 11:21:21 AM, David wrote: DH> Looking at the Web Fonts spec, it seems to me that it is way too DH> complex right now (and that this is probably a significant reason DH> that it hasn't seen more success in being implemented). DH> Wouldn't it be sufficient to simply support the addition of URIs to DH> font-family? That would be a highly backwards-incompatible change! And it would completely destroy the CSS1 font model. So, its a really poor idea. DH> This would work properly with fallback, and thus could DH> work in conjunction with installed fonts on the system, and the URI DH> could be to a zip file that contained all the variants of a font as DH> well if needed. DH> dave DH> (hyatt@apple.com) -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Interaction Domain Leader Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group W3C Graphics Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CGReceived on Thursday, 24 August 2006 08:39:41 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:46 GMT