W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > August 2006

Re: Selector for parent/predecessor?

From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 10:31:54 -0500
Message-ID: <44EC74EA.2010704@mit.edu>
To: Peter Nederlof <peter.nederlof@lostboys.nl>
CC: www-style@w3.org

Peter Nederlof wrote:
> In my opinion you're sending out the wrong message if the argument for
> not implementing (or considering) a spec, is that it may be difficult to
> implement, and assumed inefficient at best when implemented. The less
> there is to support, the faster the system. The fastest implementation
> therefore supports next to nothing ... 

Sure, so it becomes a matter of balance, as I mentioned in my last mail.

> As an everyday user of CSS I actually can't fathom why it never made it
> to a spec. Now, if only everything in the specs were supported! ;)

It never made it into a spec because implementors have thus far said they have 
no plans to support it.

-Boris
Received on Wednesday, 23 August 2006 15:34:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:46 GMT