W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > August 2006

Re: Selector for parent/predecessor?

From: Christoph Päper <christoph.paeper@crissov.de>
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 08:17:04 +0200
Message-Id: <465A09E9-B8CF-4A28-8E5F-5C9851208824@crissov.de>
To: www-style@w3.org


*Lachlan Hunt*:
> IIRC, such proposals get rejected because it doesn't fit the CSS  
> processing model and also performance issues.

It could be made mandatory for static media types only or completely  
optional.

Received on Monday, 21 August 2006 06:17:13 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Giuseppe Bilotta: "Re: Selector for parent/predecessor?"
Previous message: Giuseppe Bilotta: "Re: Selector for parent/predecessor?"
In reply to: Lachlan Hunt: "Re: Selector for parent/predecessor?"
Next in thread: Ian Hickson: "Re: Selector for parent/predecessor?"
Reply: Ian Hickson: "Re: Selector for parent/predecessor?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:46 GMT