W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > August 2006

Re: allowed arguments to :not()

From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 18:01:53 +0200
Message-ID: <44E88771.5020604@disruptive-innovations.com>
To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>

Lachlan Hunt wrote:

> e.g. :not(foo[bar]) could be written as :not(foo):not([bar]), but that's 
> not very intuitive for authors.

No. :not(foo[bar]) is NOT equivalent to :not(foo):not([bar]) but is
equivalent to :not(foo), :not([bar])

</Daniel>
Received on Sunday, 20 August 2006 16:02:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:46 GMT