W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > August 2006

Re: XBL in CSS

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 11:51:06 -0700
To: "Matthew Raymond" <mattraymond@earthlink.net>
Cc: www-style@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.ted3zgna64w2qv@id-c0020.globalsuite.net>

On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 11:41:23 -0700, Matthew Raymond  
<mattraymond@earthlink.net> wrote:
> Thought:
>
> | ::bound-element(xbl2) { /* For XBL 2.0. */ }
> | ::bound-element(-moz-xbl) { /* For Mozilla XBL 1.0. */ }
> | ::bound-element(-ms-htc) { /* For Microsoft HTML Components. */ }
> | ::bound-element() { /* For ANY binding language. */ }
>
>    ...As in "::bound-element(binding-language)" to indicate which one
> you're binding to, with the default being any language if no value is
> specified.

For one, it shouldn't be a pseudo-element. And what's the use of doing it  
per binding language? Why would styling be any different? And why would  
you want to have multiple binding languages...


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Wednesday, 16 August 2006 18:51:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:46 GMT