On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 11:41:23 -0700, Matthew Raymond <mattraymond@earthlink.net> wrote: > Thought: > > | ::bound-element(xbl2) { /* For XBL 2.0. */ } > | ::bound-element(-moz-xbl) { /* For Mozilla XBL 1.0. */ } > | ::bound-element(-ms-htc) { /* For Microsoft HTML Components. */ } > | ::bound-element() { /* For ANY binding language. */ } > > ...As in "::bound-element(binding-language)" to indicate which one > you're binding to, with the default being any language if no value is > specified. For one, it shouldn't be a pseudo-element. And what's the use of doing it per binding language? Why would styling be any different? And why would you want to have multiple binding languages... -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>Received on Wednesday, 16 August 2006 18:51:30 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 11 September 2008 23:28:51 GMT