- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 15:21:28 -0700
- To: www-style@w3.org
On Tue, 15 Aug 2006 15:18:25 -0700, Philip TAYLOR <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk> wrote: > Surely the latter two options /are/ the lesser of the two evils : > users who choose to use either of the latter two to achieve > what is generally regarded as a highly undesirable effect clearly > identify themselves as being neither concerned about standards > nor concerned about the received wisdom pertaining to the effect > they are setting out to accomplish. By incorporating > "text-decoration: blink" into CSS, the CSS WG are (IMHO) > sadly giving tacit approval to the effect's use :-( They are giving browser vendors a way to interoperate on features their users want without having to resort to extensions. That's actually useful. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Tuesday, 15 August 2006 22:21:44 UTC