W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > August 2006

Re: Solving the alpha images and background-color problem

From: Emrah BASKAYA <emrahbaskaya@hesido.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2006 21:27:21 +0300
To: "Simon Pieters" <zcorpan@hotmail.com>, www-style@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.td037vsi8nstxa@lomarnona>

I have come up with several proposals that tried to address this problem  
but it didn't generate the necessary interest. Can't still figure out  
exactly why we don't need to fix this accessibility problem is still a  
mystery to me.

Emrah Baskaya


On Fri, 04 Aug 2006 04:34:11 +0300, Simon Pieters <zcorpan@hotmail.com>  
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> In response to:
>
>    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2005Aug/0075.html
>
> I think this is really needed (I find myself having to use opaque images  
> because the background color would shine though), but I propose a  
> simpler syntax:
>
>    'background-color'
>       Value: <color> [ <color> ]?
>       Initial: transparent
>       Applies to: all elements
>       Inherited: no
>       Percentages: N/A
>       Media: visual
>       Computed value: <color> <color>
>
> I'm not sure about the computed value though, perhaps if both are the  
> same it should compute to just <color>? Or be as specified?
>
> Proposed new text for [css3-background]:
>
>    This property sets the background color of an element (the first  
> value), and the background
>    color to be used instead when one or more background images are  
> present for that element (the
>    second value). When the second value is omitted it is the same as the  
> first value. Valid color values
>    are defined in the Color Module [CSS3COLOR].
>
> Regards,
> Simon Pieters
>
>
>
> __________ NOD32 1.1454 (20060321) Information __________
>
> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
> http://www.nod32.com
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 9 August 2006 18:27:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:46 GMT