W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > April 2006

Re: Downloadable fonts and image replacement

From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 21:08:32 +0100
Message-ID: <444E81C0.1010402@splintered.co.uk>
To: www-style@w3.org

Anne van Kesteren wrote:

>> The problem here is that if a user wants the font, what will stop them
>> from downloading the ttf file?
> 
> Why are fonts so different from other types of files?

Is it because if, say, you have an image on a site, somebody can steal 
it for their own screen-resolution stuff, but would be hard pressed to 
use it for print-quality, large scale designs, whereas fonts can in fact 
be used for any size/quality? Same probably applies to graphical vector 
formats here...

P
-- 
Patrick H. Lauke
__________________________________________________________
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
http://redux.deviantart.com
__________________________________________________________
Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force
http://webstandards.org/
__________________________________________________________
Received on Tuesday, 25 April 2006 20:09:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:44 GMT