Bert Bos wrote: > On Wednesday 10 August 2005 18:28, Staffan Måhlén wrote: > >>>On Wednesday 2005-06-15 18:24 +0200, Staffan Måhlén wrote: > > >>>>Whats the reason for choosing the approach that the CSS renderer >>>>needs to be aware of a ratio rather than that the embedded media >>>>needs to be made aware of the CSS constraints? > > > The CSS WG discussed your suggestion and decided not to change the > algorithm in CSS 2.1. There may be room for other algorithms in CSS3, > but that needs investigation, probably in cooperation with the CDF WG. Ok, thanks for considering it. Would it be possible/useful to remove the HTML example and remove the fallback pixels (both of those are new to CSS 2.1 i belive)? eg: http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/conform.html#replaced-element "(for example a blank HTML document)" http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/visudet.html#inline-replaced-width "becomes 300px. If 300px is too wide to fit the device, UAs should use the width of the largest rectangle that has a 2:1 ratio and fits the device instead." /StaffanReceived on Thursday, 15 September 2005 12:54:47 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:40 GMT