W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > October 2005

Re: [CSS21] Unclear status of different versions

From: Steve Zilles <szilles@adobe.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2005 22:37:20 -0700
Message-Id: <6.2.1.2.2.20051003223546.10d567a0@namailhost.corp.adobe.com>
To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Cc: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, www-style@w3.org, w3c-css-wg@w3.org
At 08:17 PM 10/3/2005, Ian Hickson wrote:
>On Mon, 3 Oct 2005, Steve Zilles wrote:
> > >
> > > It seems to me that we really should rescind CSS2
> >
> > There is only one large problem with this view. Major parts of the CSS2 REC
> > are normatively referenced by the XSL 1.0 REC
>
>Actually XSL's reference to CSS2 is not a normative reference:
>
>    http://www.w3.org/TR/xsl/sliceD.html#section-N85770-Other-References

I cannot speak for the references section, but the normative text does 
refer to CSS2. See for example Section 7.1
    http://www.w3.org/TR/xsl/slice7.html#pr-section
which says the properties a copied from CSS2 and that the CSS2 Errata apply.


>--
>Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
>http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
>Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'

         Steve
=====================================
Steve Zilles
115 Lansberry Court,
Los Gatos, CA 95032-4710
steve@zilles.org 
Received on Tuesday, 4 October 2005 05:41:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:41 GMT