W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > November 2005

Re: [CSS 2.1] Proposed Rewording for Cascading Rules

From: Adam Kuehn <akuehn@nc.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 16:20:50 -0500
Message-Id: <7.0.0.10.2.20051118161643.02287e88@nc.rr.com>
To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, www-style@w3.org

L. David Baron wrote:
>The interaction of !important with style attributes is tested in
>   http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Test/CSS1/current/test31.htm
>(the third test).
>
>All of the browsers you mention pass that test, as the spec currently
>requires.

Bloody hell!  I wrote my own test case and had a typo.  I was 
inadvertently testing error recovery behavior.  Blast!

>I agree that
>http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-CSS21-20050613/cascade.html#cascading-order
>is a bit unclear, but I don't think it needs to be nearly as verbose as
>you propose.

Clarity is preferred to conciseness, but if a test case is already 
out there and everyone passes, who really cares?  It doesn't get more 
clear than that.  Sorry for the noise, folks.

-Adam Kuehn 
Received on Friday, 18 November 2005 21:21:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:41 GMT