- From: Orion Adrian <orion.adrian@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 12:56:48 -0500
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 11/2/05, Andrew Fedoniouk <news@terrainformatica.com> wrote: > Hi, Orion, > > > :can-have-focus seems more semantic than :tab-stop > > Oh, that semantic.... Something tells me that > your phrase "more semantic" from semantic point of view just > degrade semantical meaning of the semantic as an entitiy :) > > To be short: what do you mean exactly? > > Technically speaking: > > can-have-focus - means: can have a focus but may not *now* accept it. > tab-stop - means: this element *now* is 1) "focusable" and 2) > "tab-stopable". > > I cannot imagine situations when you need to designate *all* > focusable elements. > > Example: > buttons on the toolbar, they have focus (to be precise toolbar by itself > can have a focus ) when you will click on it. > But toolbar is out of tab order. > > What do you want from ":can-have-focus" to select? My point is that tab-stop implies that the button used will be a tab when that isn't necessarily true. -- Orion Adrian
Received on Wednesday, 2 November 2005 17:56:52 UTC